To Miss Thin.
The biggest contributing factor in
determining a countries Olympic standing is their population. I theorize that a
larger population creates a bustling economy and helps create a larger buzz for
the Olympics, bringing more money into the country. Another contribution of a
large population is a diversity that smaller populations may not possess.
Larger more diverse pools of athletes can create the best possible outcome for
an Olympic sport. While at the same time a large population could be crippling.
Bigger populations can decrease the chance of finding that all-star athlete
that pushes a country to a gold medal.
To clearly explain my reasoning
behind this, I have none. This is stupid. I don’t know how or why Olympic medals
have anything to do with population. Or anything to do with that list you gave
us for that matter. How does this help me in the future? Will knowing the Olympic
results for Paraguay really help me on the SAT’s? No, it won’t. The problem is
you are so used to giving us an assignment and having us be occupied with it no
one would ask questions. Well I like to learn. And I am getting sick and tired
of wasting an hour and a half of my life every day for a second vocabulary
class.
Now here’s a real question. What is
the correlation of students that have an NC in your class who love to learn?
Because kids, teens, and young adults love to learn. So stop blaming your bad
teaching methods on my class as a whole. Because it’s stupid. Problem is I can’t
say any of this. I can’t say how shit I think your class is, or how I wish your
over glorified vocab class would kindly go away. I do know that I have gone
further over the word count writing a rant about your horrid class then I ever
could have made if I was writing a legitimate response to your ridiculous question.
Thank you.
With warm regards,
Hunter Baugus.
No comments:
Post a Comment